I spent the last week on a variety of cool gaming-related activities, most of them being Dark Souls 3 or anything Souls-adjacent. In my DS downtime I decided to give two very different indie titles a go. The first one was the groundbreaking Super Meat Boy that opened a lot of doors for indie developers couple of years back. My second pick was a direct beneficiary of these open doors; the wildly popular Enter the Gungeon. Both games are fairly unique but, at the same time, they also encapsulate the kind of gameplay that Western indie devs are known for. Both games focus on a seemingly endless variety of new challenges and levels that are driven by a punishing difficulty level. I obviously turned out to be terrible at both Gungeon and Meat Boy and I wasn’t in the least surprised by that. Over the last 7 years the term “indie” has become a shorthand for extreme difficulty in game most of us just accepted that as an integral element of independent games.
I personally find it very odd that, despite the incredible growth of the indie space, we never really even considered why many smaller developers build their products around the idea of a very formidable challenge. While analyzing this phenomenon we first have to understand the origins of it. In the early days of the indie movement sales of smaller games were driven primarily by Microsoft’s Xbox Live Arcade. The was XBLA was marketed focused on a “By Gamers, for Gamers” notion that generated a lot of grassroots support for the program among the core gaming community. I would argue that it was this very concept of gamer legitimacy that first inspired indie developers to make their games hard. Getting the support of enthusiast gamers was quite obviously key to creating what turned out to be an entire new subset of the gaming industry. Difficulty was initially used to show the indie devs’ commitment to cater to core gamers, as well as a homage to games of old. Over the years the indie game as an entity came to be known as a very tricky animal indeed. The problem with this assertion is that indie gaming is in a completely different place in 2016 and what made sense several years ago might actually be holding developers back.
Challenge has always been a central component of most video games. A lot of us play games to get the wonderful feeling of validation you get from overcoming the odds and achieving something. When games use difficulty to entice the player the results can be very compelling. Super Meat Boy is definitely a superb example of how to use difficulty to convey the ambiance the developers want to create. In Team Meat’s 2011 creation you are faced with a ton of bite-size levels that require the player to perform different tiny feats of dexterity. The game is played at a crazy pace that keeps you immersed at all times, no matter the magnitude of your failures. The fail state is so brief of a moment that the player’s brain doesn’t even have time to properly register what transpired. This is why Meat Boy also incorporates a unique replay mechanic that shows all your different failures alongside the one successful attempt, all on one insane replay screen. Most of all, Super Meat Boy does not gate significant content and mechanics behind a difficulty wall. You are given all the tools from the get-go and your progress simply unlocks more of the very same addictive gameplay. This is why I consider the meaty indie classic to be a shining example of how indie devs should implement difficulty into their creations.
Unfortunately, a lot of smaller developers are struggling to discern when difficulty is truly indispensable to what they are trying to create and when it is merely a feature of their product. Let us take Enter the Gungeon as our test case, even though it has to be pointed out that nearly every game in the rogue-lite genre is guilty of the very same. In Enter the Gungeon you are tasked with fighting your way through a gun-themed dungeon using a wide variety of weapons. What makes the game great is the extremely creative theme and the endless supply of cool guns. Unfortunately, the game is also a very difficult experience that ,in all likelihood, may prove to be too difficult for quite many gamers. The lack of adjustable difficulty in Gungeon is a prime example of the unnecessary insistence on making indie titles hard. What pains me is the fact that including adjustable difficulty in a game like Enter the Gungeon would not make a difference to core players that enjoy the difficulty and, at the same time, it would certainly help to get the full experience for those of us not equipped with flexible fingers.
In the last few years, thanks to the rise of the indies, we have experienced a diverse spectrum of amazing games that would’ve never seen the light of day otherwise. While I’m certainly thankful for that I’m also a bit disappointed that many developers still feel they have an obligation to make their games universally difficult. Modern indie titles are much more than ultra-difficult retro gimmicks. Making them accessible to as many players as possible should always be a priority. Obviously, accessibility should never interfere with artistic integrity of the dev. We have to remember that some games use difficulty to convey complex messages or evoke specific feelings in the player. I myself argued not so long ago that the inclusion of an easy mode in Dark Souls would interfere with what the game is at its core. Ultimately though, most games are not the From Software masterpiece and the difficulty is most often an ancillary feature that is just a small part of a much greater design. The obligation to keep all indie games rock hard is a relic of the early years of indie gaming. As we’re seeing more and more indie titles enter the mainstream, the expectations put on these games change. Maintaining their legitimacy while opening up to new customers will certainly a challenge. Luckily, independent developers are a rather creative lot.
Originally posted in Crippled Gaming on April 18th, 2016
More Game Articles
2 responses to “Indie Games & Difficulty: Reconsidering Old Principles”
Rogue-lites are *supposed* to be hard. Rogue was hard. The entire idea is that it’s hard as hell and death is permanent, so you’re basically competing with yourself and the game to see just how long you can go, either till you beat it or until you give up. If it’s easy, it’s completely pointless.
You’ve confused a specific genre that is and always has been hard with indies in general. Dust: An elysian tail isn’t hard. ShadowRun Returns isn’t hard. Terraria isn’t hard. Minecraft isn’t hard. Trine isn’t hard. Her Story isn’t hard. Firewatch isn’t hard.
Yes, some indies are way harder than anything a AAA studio would ever release, but indies can afford to appeal to a small audience that likes that kind of thing and still profit of projects like that in a way AAA studios can’t. The indies in “dead” genres tend to be hard because the people who are likely to buy it are genre fans and thus likely bored by something easy.
Some indies are hilariously easy. For the same reasons really. Their intended market (if they have one) isn’t likely to give a crap and/or it’s not the point.
Also, it’s not like you can just slot a difficulty setting into every game. For 1 difficulty settings inherently flawed, not only do I have no way of knowing what difficulty to pick before actually playing to see how hard it is (no, a little description doesn’t count,) but studies have shown that players are more likely to quit than they are to adjust the difficulty. For 2 games like Super Meat Boy don’t even have room. There is only 1 variable, how many hits it takes to kill you. Unless they re design the levels for each difficulty, there’s nothing they can do without breaking their levels.
Finally, some indies are hard for precisely the same reason old games were hard: They’re short. If you make yourself invincible you can plow hotline miami in just a couple hours. Same with Super Meatboy. It’s gonna feel like a huge waste of money to drop 5 or 10, or even 20 USD on a game that you then plow through in 4 hours. The game, and that money, go much, much farther if the player has to struggle to advance. Suddenly victories mean something not because the plot says so (if it does) but because it was hard. Suddenly you have real steaks, not because the plot says so but because you have 4 levels and a ton of loot riding on this fight.
In short, I think you dismissing difficulty as ancillary is ignorant. No matter what Nintendo tells you, difficulty is a fundamental aspect of the design of many, many games, even games *with* difficulty settings. It can dictate an enormous chunk of the experience. If you want examples of it actually being ancillary then look to Bethesdas recent games (which are basically just about doing whatever you want,) or Final Fantasy 10 (which is all about the story and everything else is essentially filler.)
Thanks for the interesting read. I’ve never really thought about the difficulty in indies being a mainstay for the “genre” (if you can call it that). Some other indies (or small studio enough to be considered indie) that I’ve played and come to mind are Axiom Verge, Hotline Miami, Salt and Sanctuary, Helldivers, Child of Light, Faster Than Light, Resogun, Ultratron, Geometry Wars, and Galak-Z. I definitely see your point about the difficulty being present in Super Meat Boy and Enter the Gungeon (although I haven’t played then). That said, I’m not so sure that just because a game is developed by a small independent team necessarily means it will be difficult like the old school games on the earliest consoles. Still, thanks for the good read. It’s certainly something to think about.
Log in to leave a Comment