So am I the only one that thinks those equations can’t be right? They have faulty bounding conditions.
“When ATN + (3 * ADP) is less than or equal to 120: ((ATN + (3 * ADP)) / 4) + 80”
This is “supposed” to be used for agility values under 110, but that equation clearly goes to 120. If (x) is equal or less than 120, you take ((x)/4)+ 80, which gives you… 120 when x = 120. Doesn’t matter how you got that 120, could be 30/30 ATN/ADP, could be 15/35, whatever, as long as they hit 120 or less after you triple adp. But that means you have an agi over 110, so you use the other equation, but the other equation tells you to have a ATN+3*ADP of over 120, which you don’t. Something is either wrong or explained poorly.