Comments posted to our Dark Souls 3 Wiki
By Anonymous
The attacks required need to be reduced by half and the time required need to be doubled. As for the healing, make it 50.
By Anonymous
It would be nice to have a table for how many hits for each weapon needs to proc, period. No need for doing it really fast.
By Anonymous
I get that this ring can be gotten as early as Undead Settlement, but c'mon man! This is a boss ring. 30 HP gets less and less value the more HP you have. Maybe if it was a fixed percentage or a flat amount like 100 - 150 HP would be better. Especially once you get to mid game.
By Anonymous
Imagine picking this over Vordt's hammer
By Anonymous
I picked this because i thought it would be useful, now i ****ing regret it
By Anonymous
I picked this thinking it would be like the rally mechanic from bloodborne. God damn did I get duked...
By Anonymous
Trash. Just use Life Ring +3. At 40 Vigor it gives you more than 120 hp, equivalent to proccing Pontiff's LE 4 times which the average fight isnt even long enough to do so let alone being able to maintain the necessary attack chains to even make this ring useful.
By Anonymous
Ring of the Evil Eye +3 is also another great substitiution in PVE
By Anonymous
if i make a attack that is 2 hits and land them both will i get 60 hp or 30?
By Anonymous
can you sell the ring?
By Anonymous
Yes, it sells for 500 souls
By Anonymous
Yes, and if you hit two or more enemies with the WA it's a free full heal.
By Anonymous
this ring is great. only need to proc it 50 times to heal to full. much better than if I needed to proc it a million times, or 2 trillion times. might even need nerfed.
By Anonymous
hey guys all the tables here are outdated asf, i'd recommend you to watch limit breaker's video on this ring (can't put direct link here) but look up "The Wolf Sword vs The Pontiff's Left Eye... ᵃ ᵘˢᵉˡᵉˢˢˡʸ ᶜᵒᵐᵖˡᶦᶜᵃᵗᵉᵈ ᵍᵘᶦᵈᵉ" on youtube. tl;dr all weapons need a LOT less attacks, biggest changes going on heavier weapons classes (great hammer 1hr1 12 -> 4, great axe 1hr1 10 -> 4, etc) can someone update the table please?
  • 1
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9