Do you stroke the kitten or put it in the blender? RPG Morality

Do you stroke the kitten or put it in the blender? RPG Morality

In this article, I want to explore what morality has meant in RPGs, what it means in real life and where gaming could be taking us. Morality in RPGs often boils down to two clearly signposted options: the Good Hero decision and the Bad Person decision.

Morality and the modern RPG

You are walking through the city when you come across a stray cat. It is hungry and has lost its family. Will you A: Stroke the cat and gently say, “Come on…I’ll take you home”? Or will you pick option B: Put it in a blender and laugh manically?

If you chose A: Congratulations! You are a Good Person! You will receive the instant gratification of a shining blue light surrounding your avatar.ย  You’ll probably be given a reward from some grateful NPC for helping their cat once the side-quest is completed. If you chose B: Boo! You are a Bad Person! Have a red shimmery outline and an Evil Whiskers potion instead. Cat lovers the world over will be hoping that you choke on it. Drinking it may give you a slight boost in combat but will do nothing to mask your wickedness.

I love games such as Mass Effect, Dragon Age and the Fable series. It is rare that they ever leave you in any doubt as to whether you have done the right thing though. In the original Mass Effect series, you can proceed through the trilogy easily selecting Paragon options. You’ll be safe in the knowledge that you did the right thing and will be rewarded for it. If you are ever confused about whether you did the right thing – don’t worry! The Paragon point will reassure you that you did select the right option from the dialogue wheel.

Fable Morality

Will Sir be trying the obviously good choice or the obviously bad choice from the morality menu today?

Morality in real-life

In real-life, morality is rarely that simple and it is not often the case that nice people are the ones who reap the largest rewards. Sure, sometimes you will be rewarded for doing what appears to be the right thing. Often though, you will be left without any reward or recognition at all apart from a thank you if you are lucky. You may also be left wondering why somebody who appears to be a borderline psychopath gets promoted ahead of you in work or manages to date the person that you had always been attracted to.

There will also be many occasions where there isn’t an obviously good choice to be made at all. I can think of times where it felt like the only way to change the situation was to choose one of a variety of bad options that were available to me at the time. The best that I could hope for was to choose the lesser evil – and it was not always readily apparent which of the options available would be the least damaging decision. There are also times when a decision may seem to be good in terms of helping a smaller group of people but which may actually have a harmful impact on society as a whole.

morality mass effect commander shepard

Shepard looks so grumpy! Has he been punished for making too many Bad Person Decisions?

Morality in early RPGs

We have come a long way since the early RPGs on the SNES such as Secret of Mana and Breath of Fire. When asked by some whiny girl to save her village, occasionally you were given the option to say “No”. This would result in her saying “Aw, that’s too bad. I’ll be here if you change your mind” or words to that effect. The plot wouldn’t proceed until you told the annoying tyke that yes, you’d love to solve her problems. It’s not like you had anything better to do that day, right? The plot would then proceed with zero acknowledgement that you had initially refused her request.

All that you were given in the early RPGs was an illusion of choice. Ultimately there were no real moral decisions to be made at all; you were a plucky spiky haired hero and would always do the right thing. It wasn’t really your story – it was more like you being a spectator to someone else’s adventure.

secret of mana morality early rpg

In early RPGs such as Secret of Mana, you’re the hero & only had an illusion of choice if you were lucky.

Fifty Shades of Grey Moral Decisions

What if it wasn’t always signposted whether or not what you were doing was the right thing? Also, what if sometimes there was no obviously good option at all? Or what if even if there was an obviously “good” aligned decision, the game still ultimately punished you for doing it?

Maybe the lost cat was possessed by a demon and it massacres a family after you help it. Sure, the game would probably have to drop a small hint that animals being possessed was a possibility or that this particular cat could be possessed but only the tiniest of hint may be needed. After all, it’s rarely clear in real-life exactly what the consequences of each action will be and it would be a shame to ruin the surprise.

Games such as CD Projekt Red‘s The Witcher series show that more complicated moral decisions can work with RPGs. I can remember many of the decisions that I made in the very first The Witcher game. Even though now I know what the consequences of my actions were in the later games, I’m still not certain whether or not I really did the right thing from a morality perspective. I hope that more game companies will follow suit and craft more complicated stories that will really challenge their players.

Would you like more ambiguous moral decisions or do you prefer to keep things simple? Please comment below and let us know!

I hope that you enjoyed reading this article. If you did, you may be interested to read My Top RPG Game of All Timeย or you could check out The Witcher 3 Wiki.


I love gaming, creative writing, the theatre, anime, watching football & spending time with friends & family. I'm also a bit obsessed with superheroes.

View my other posts

9 comments on “Do you stroke the kitten or put it in the blender? RPG Morality”

  1. Avatar elnawawi says:

    Nier: Automata have one of two of these mind blowing choices that’s more gray than black and white.
    Dragon Age is way better than Mass Effect at presenting real-life like choices. The choice of the Dwarven king in first game for example is a perfect example. All choices in DA: Inquisition have this vague line, until now, we don’t know their consequences, and we question whether it ends up bad or good in next game.

    Until now, there’s team pro Loghan although what he did in the very first few hours of the first game. and other examples.

  2. Avatar skarekrow13 says:

    That’s why I really liked the Telltale Batman games. Realistic choices with few obvious ones regarding morality.

  3. Avatar Fallenangel700 says:

    While it’s hardly a deep RPG, Grim Dawn has some interesting choices.
    A man is bleeding out on the side of the road. He says his partner betrayed him, shanked him, and stole the loot they had. The dying man asks you to get revenge. When you catch up with the partner, he says he killed the man because he had tried to rape his daughter.
    Who is telling the truth? Neither has any proof other then what they say.

  4. Avatar qeter says:

    i tried playing knights of the old republic 2 a couple weeks ago but the moral and dialogue choices were so clear, two of the first dialogue choice are asking if a woman is okay or telling her you’ll kill her if she gets in your way, i could hardly play it. neverwinter nights 2 on the other hand offers quite a few morally ambiguous choices (trick a violent local lizard clan near your village into letting you into their sacred chamber or use force and assure your villages safety on a longer term). more complex choices are definitely in style and i don’t think that will change even if it stops being in focus like it is at the moment.

  5. ckmishn says:

    There are 5 Fallout RPGs (excluding the Brotherhood of Steal game). Arguably all of them contained complex morality systems. The Fallout 3 games, admittedly, did have a "karma" system, but the larger choices, at least, we more subtle, and all 4 major factions in Fallout 4 had understandable motives (even if some of their endings were contrived).

  6. Avatar Caradox says:

    Hi elnawari. Yes, you’re right – Dragon Age did handle morality better than Mass Effect. It seemed that the game was leading you to think the traditional dwarven king was the "good" option. Then you look at what they both actually did after becoming king.

  7. Avatar Caradox says:

    FALLOUT 3 SPOILERS: Hi ckmishn. On my first playthrough of Fallout 3, I basically played it as a "good" character (topped out the karma meter) right up until the ending. Then I had some radiation-proof mutant tell me that I had to go and press a button in a highly radiated area because of destiny or some such rubbish. It made no sense to me why he wouldn’t go and do it. I’m good…not stupid. The ending frustrated me but on the whole I loved the game and it did present some more complex moral situations.

    I enjoyed Fallout 4 too…and New Vegas. With Fallout 4, I think the character I was playing was more amoral than immoral. He wouldn’t punch somebody just for the sake of it but everything was about his own survival and his own profit. If going along with the apparent "good guys" seemed more beneficial to him at the time, fine. But he wouldn’t think anything of betraying them if it seemed better to support another faction.

  8. Nunkuruji says:

    Does drinking the blended kitten give me +1 Might?

  9. ckmishn says:

    Yeah, that was one thing that basically everyone agreed was idiotic. Even Bethesda did, eventually. If you got the DLC (I forget which), it actually makes it so you can send the supermutant in. Of course there was zero reason not to fix this as, even if you do to in there, you end up waking up later having been miraculously saved, with the DOC continuing from that point.

Log in to leave a Comment